Skip to main content
GASSTUDI
Building in Public12 min read

GAS Studio's First 90 Days: What Worked, What Didn't, and What's Next

A transparent retrospective on GAS Studio's first 90 days as a venture studio — wins, failures, lessons, and the Q2 plan going forward.

Nic DeMore

Nic DeMore

Founder, GAS Studio · April 28, 2026

GAS Studio venture studio first 90 days retrospective dashboard showing portfolio progress and metrics

Three months ago, GAS Studio was a concept document, a domain name, and a lot of ambition. Today it's a live website, a growing Journal, a portfolio of ventures in various stages, and — most importantly — a set of systems that actually work.

This is the venture studio first 90 days retrospective. What worked, what didn't, the lessons I'm taking forward, and the plan for Q2. If you've been following the Building in Public series, you know the deal: honesty first, polish second.

What Worked

The Journal became a real asset. This surprised me — not because I didn't believe in content marketing, but because the speed at which the Journal started generating results exceeded my expectations.

Twenty-seven entries published in the first quarter. Topics spanning marketing strategy, venture philosophy, practical tools, and personal essays. The SEO content strategy we built around specific, intent-rich keywords is starting to gain traction. Entries targeting long-tail keywords like "LLC for side projects" and "small business automations" are climbing search rankings.

The Journal also serves as the connective tissue between ventures. Every spotlight entry (Sundream, Giveable) drives traffic to the venture while reinforcing the GAS Studio brand. That cross-pollination effect is exactly what the venture studio model is designed to produce.

Sundream's growth continued. The Etsy store maintained its growth trajectory throughout Q1. Revenue was up quarter-over-quarter, customer reviews remained strong, and the safari-inspired design line expanded with new products. The automation systems we built — order processing, follow-up sequences, inventory tracking — kept operations smooth even as volume increased.

The studio infrastructure proved its value. The shared tech stack, the content frameworks, the automation workflows, the legal structure — all of these assets serve multiple ventures simultaneously. When we started work on Giveable's development, we didn't start from scratch. We started from the platform that already existed. That's the startup quarterly review metric that matters most: are the shared systems accelerating new ventures? The answer is yes.

Margle cross-pollination worked. Entries that reference Margle Media work — like the paid advertising trends piece and the AI at Margle breakdown — performed well and added professional credibility that a standalone venture studio couldn't easily establish. The two brands reinforce each other.

What Didn't Work

"Coming Soon" ventures got almost zero attention. Let's be honest: Foundations of Architecture, Grow From Here, LoudHype, OCM Performance, KitDrop — these are listed on the site, but they received minimal development time in Q1. The portfolio is broad, but depth is where value gets created.

This was predictable and still a problem. Having nine "Coming Soon" ventures might look ambitious on the website. In practice, it means resources are spread too thin to make meaningful progress on any of them. The founder retrospective here is clear: focus beats breadth.

Email list growth was slower than planned. The newsletter signup exists. People can subscribe. But active list growth — through dedicated lead magnets, content upgrades, and strategic CTAs — didn't receive the systematic attention it needed. The content marketing strategy I described in the Journal is the right approach, but we didn't execute the distribution layer aggressively enough.

Mobile experience needs work. The GAS Studio website was built desktop-first, and while it functions on mobile, the experience doesn't match the quality of the desktop version. Several animation features that work beautifully on desktop cause performance issues on mobile devices. This is a technical debt item that needs addressing in Q2.

Content distribution was inconsistent. We published consistently — two entries per week, every week. But distribution beyond the website itself — social media, email, cross-platform promotion — was inconsistent. Building in public update: we built the content engine, but we under-invested in the amplification layer. Great content that nobody sees isn't great content marketing.

Lessons From the First 90 Days

Write everything down. The discipline of documenting decisions, processes, and systems through this Journal has been more valuable than I anticipated. When I need to remember why we chose a specific tool or made a specific strategic decision, the Journal entry is there. It's an institutional memory system that costs nothing beyond the time to write.

Two ventures per quarter for deep work. Going forward, I'm limiting active development to two ventures per quarter, with maintenance-level attention to the rest. In Q1, the effective deep-work ventures were Sundream and the GAS Studio infrastructure itself. Everything else got surface-level attention. Being honest about that constraint — rather than pretending I can meaningfully advance ten ventures simultaneously — is the startup quarterly review insight I need to internalize.

SEO is a slow burn but it compounds. Three months of consistent publishing hasn't made us a search engine powerhouse. But the trajectory is clear: rankings are improving, organic traffic is growing, and older entries are starting to rank for their target keywords. The content strategy framework works. It just requires patience, which is why I keep coming back to the slow down principle.

Purpose keeps you going when metrics don't. There were weeks in Q1 where the numbers were discouraging — low traffic, slow growth, ventures not moving as fast as I wanted. What kept me building was conviction in the mission. Doing good, at scale isn't just a tagline. It's the reason I show up when the spreadsheet doesn't justify it.

The Q2 Plan

Based on everything above, here's where GAS Studio focuses for the next ninety days.

Deep-work ventures: Sundream + Giveable. Sundream gets focused attention on expanding beyond Etsy — Shopify storefront development, wholesale exploration, and expanded product lines. Giveable moves from concept to MVP — the core platform, the donation flow, the registry experience.

Systematic content distribution. Every Journal entry gets a distribution workflow: social media posts (automated), newsletter inclusion, cross-links from related entries, and at least one external distribution touchpoint. We have the automation infrastructure for this. We just need to use it consistently.

Mobile and performance improvements. The website gets a focused mobile optimization pass. Animations that hurt performance on mobile get simplified or disabled. The core experience — reading the Journal, exploring ventures, getting in touch — should be excellent on every device.

Email list as strategic priority. Building the email list from an afterthought to a priority. Content upgrades for high-performing entries. A dedicated lead magnet. A welcome sequence that introduces GAS Studio's mission and portfolio. Email is the owned channel that doesn't depend on algorithm changes.

Purpose Protocol pre-production. The podcast moves into pre-production: episode planning, guest outreach, equipment setup, and format refinement. Target: batch-record the first ten episodes by end of Q2.

Baseline metrics. Establishing clear benchmarks for Q2 so the next venture studio progress report has specific numbers to compare against. Website traffic, email list size, Sundream revenue, Journal rankings, Giveable development milestones.

The Bigger Picture

Ninety days isn't long enough to build anything meaningful. It's long enough to build the foundation for something meaningful.

GAS Studio's first quarter was about infrastructure — the systems, the content engine, the operational backbone that everything else will run on. Q2 is about building on that foundation. Deeper work on fewer things. Better distribution. More focus.

The venture studio model works. The philosophy — systems first, purpose always — works. The Journal works. The team works.

Now it's about execution. Consistent, focused, purposeful execution. One venture at a time. One entry at a time. One quarter at a time.

Follow the Journal for quarterly updates and behind-the-scenes looks at the GAS Studio journey. Or get in touch — I'm always open to connecting with fellow builders.


This entry is part of our Building in Public series. Subscribe to the GAS Studio Journal RSS feed to stay in the loop.

Related Venture

Good At Scale Studio

Doing good, at scale.

Visit

Share this entry